Any speculative trees you create will be personal and unsearchable
– open the dna profile page and check if they do have a tree but just not linked (Ancestry) <- about 75% of the people with no trees, do actually have a tree. (If you've not linked your DNA to a tree.. go and do it now!)– go to their main profile page at Ancestry, look for clues as to how long they have been researching (if a long time, then they may have a tree on another site)– check their main page for age range and location ... sometimes people put heaps of really useful info on their profile– google their name/ profile name using some of the clues you may have found – looking for possible hits on who they are. Learn to do advanced google searches.
– write all your clues down, tick them off or cross them out as you validate them/invalidate them.– look for possible trees at wikitree, geni, genes reunited, My Heritage, FMP, etc..– if you’ve now established www.datingranking.net/fabswingers-review/ a possible name, check 192 dot com, white pages, electoral rolls, pipl, etc … where you might find details about them– search for Online obituary’s (especially useful if the match is in the US as they often list all their family in detail)– bear in mind woman testers often use their e– on the matches DNA profile page, click on “shared matches”… who else do they match ? You might be able to research the group of shared matches together, working off clues from the shared matches trees. Common Matches are going to be gold when trying to identify and solve a match without a tree.– if they are at Ancestry check if they’ve uploaded to My Heritage, ftDNA or GEDmatch.. can you identify them there (if you can now you will have an email address, for more google searching) .. and also a new set of people who match you both-start building a tree for them , keep it private and unsearchable .. it’s “quick and dirty” so add hints, extra people, whatever you need to try and establish who your match is and their ancestors. This type of tree is often called a “Quick Dirty tree” – due to the fact you are doing it quickly (accept hints if using an online tree), and dirty in that you are not looking for sources at this point you are copying other peoples tree or using hints.
This action might take say 2 hours, you identify their fits and create its forest and get the brand new prominent ancestor (quickest I have complete it’s from the 45mins, since a great amount of clues fell with the place easily)But … Recall you can aquire nowhere, then you search have not gone to waste … maybe tomorrow they plan to create a forest, or they score a different mutual fits one reveals better clues. (Maintain your cards! We keep exploit inside OneNote)
Since you begin draw along with her your theory away from which this new suits are, and exactly how they interact with your, usually go back and check out and you will disprove it, aren’t getting stuck out which have confirmation bias in which you simply look to possess clues to prove the concept, furthermore see clues to help you disprove it! This consists of after you select the meets, to go back and check that DNA could not provides come from another cousin!
For ftDNA suits google the current email address to see if they features a forest someplace else, or family unit members pointers on the web
Has just some people has challenged the brand new confidentiality and you will integrity regarding evaluating people in like that. In no way are you currently starting something unlawful because of the looking social guidance to discover more on their meets (the cousin indeed). However, delight keep the search personal, for those who select some thing your own suits (the relative) probably doesn’t want wrote, delight contemplate him or her and stay ethical on the discussing pointers you have located. When the the right position looks painful and sensitive, delight approach it therefore.